Southern Appeal

Giving the bayonet to the "dictatorship of relativism" since 2002

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Survival of New Orleans Blog is up and running, here. As Brendan Loy explains, it is
run by a group of tech-nerds who are stuck in New Orelans but who have Internet access, a bunch of servers, and the ability to stream a live web cam, which they are calling "Lord of the Flies II: Escape From New Orleans." (Hey, dark humor can help people get through dark times. And besides, it's true.) Amazing stuff.

Cracking down on lawlessness? According to the AP, the mayor of New Orleans
ordered 1,500 police officers to leave their search-and-rescue mission Wednesday night and return to the streets to stop looting that has turned increasingly hostile as the city plunges deeper into chaos.

"They are starting to get closer to heavily populated areas — hotels, hospitals, and we're going to stop it right now," Nagin said in a statement to The Associated Press.
Here's a particularly chilling detail from the story:
Managers at a nursing home were prepared to cope with the power outages and had enough food for days, but then the looting began. The home's bus driver was forced to surrender the vehicle to carjackers.

Bands of people drove by the nursing home, shouting to residents, "Get out!" Eighty residents, most of them in wheelchairs, were being evacuated to other nursing homes in the state.

"We had enough food for 10 days," said Peggy Hoffman, the home's executive director. "Now we'll have to equip our department heads with guns and teach them how to shoot."
The WWL-TV version of this story is headlined, "Nagin declares Martial Law to crack down on looters," and states that the mayor "said that Martial Law means that officers don't have to worry about civil rights and Miranda rights in stopping the looters." Anyone out there know what Louisiana law says about the scope of martial law, a mayor's role in its declaration, and so on? Update: Here's a related post and comments thereon.

Donald Sensing reports that the Pentagon has said nixed the idea of using regular Army units (as distinguished from National Guard units) to restore civil order. Sensing provided some interesting background on "civil disturbance operations" from the US Army Manual in this earlier post.

Meanwhile, LSU has cancelled classes until September 6 in order to better serve as a center for emergency medical services. For a brutally vivid, eyewitness description of what LSU is like today, click here.

"What it is all about": The latest from the CFD:

Last weekend, the blog Blue Girl, Red State wrote a post about a regular blog commenter who went by the name "Shameless Hussy."

Blue Girl reports that "Shameless Hussy" went to Darfur in June as a humanitarian volunteer and was traumatized by what she saw
What she dealt with daily goes beyond the pale...beyond the nightmares of most people; Children with all four limbs hacked off right above the knee or below the elbow. Twelve year olds who died in childbirth after being gang-raped by the Janjaweed. Women who gave birth to rape-babies who were then cast out by their families for shaming the family name, leaving only one avenue of survival for themselves and their children after the camps: Prostitution.

What is [disturbing] her up is the desperation, and the fact that she worked herself to death for over a month, and she still didn't really save anyone. Now that she's gone, it's like she was never there. Even the ones she helped keep alive, she didn't save. You try dealing with that reality.

And women are the preponderance of victims. Men do not leave the villages to go to the countryside to gather firewood and other necessary items of sustenance. Women venture out, even though every time they leave their villages, they are at horrific risk of being beaten and raped and disfigured. The reason they go instead of the men? The women are only attacked, the men are killed.
This post receive a fair amount of attention within the blogosphere (as far as posts about Darfur go) mainly due to the fact that Kevin Drum linked to it. And while getting bloggers to pay attention to Darfur, if only for a minute, is a minor miracle, it is worth asking why it takes a post about traumatized aid workers to generate any interest in genocide.

This situation in Darfur has existed for over two years and, if people were interested, they could find accounts of death, disease, rape and torture occurring there on an almost daily basis. 400,000 people have died and nearly 3 million have been displaced and yet nobody - not politicans, not the media, not bloggers - really seem to care.

To anyone who has been paying attention, the atrocities witnessed by "Shameless Hussy" are, sadly, well-known. If her story generates concern for the people of Darfur, then for that we should be thankful. And if people who were moved by it are really interested in Darfur, then they should start reading the analyses produced by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Eric Reeves and the International Crisis Group, supporting organizations like Doctors Without Borders, Save the Children, Save Darfur and STAND, reading blogs like Passion of the Present, Sudan Watch, the Coalition for Darfur, and Sleepless in Sudan and demanding that their elected leaders do something about it.

Our thanks goes out to "Shameless Hussy" and all those who sacrifice to help those in need. But we must keep in mind that Darfur is not about them - it is about this

What to do with all those extra AOL CDs you have around.

Michelle Malkin is doing a yeoman's job in providing tons of links concerning the destruction caused by Katrina.

Looking for Good News from New Orleans at A Small Victory. (Hat tip to K-Lo on The Corner.)

Maureen Dowd on how Hillary can help Americans say what they secretly feel

My good friend Jonathan Hooks sent me some good comments regarding Ms. Dowd's latest column on Senator Clinton, and I thought I would share them (with his permission). Jonathan writes:

Dowd's penultimate paragraph asserts:

"But by hanging back and trimming her positions, by keeping her powder dry until a more politically advantageous time, she may miss the moment when Americans are looking for someone to emerge from her cowering party to articulate their anger about Iraq or their fear about a Supreme Court that will scale back women's rights and civil rights here, as Islamic courts do the same in Iraq."

Ahhhh, so THAT'S it. All good Americans are angry about Iraq and/or fearful that John Roberts will return this country to the days of back-alley abortions and segregated lunch counters . . . . But the reason no one seems to be saying anything is because we just don't know how to articulate that anger and fear. But Hillary, YES Hillary, she's SMART, smart enough to articulate our well-founded fears, and then we'd feel brave enough to say something ourselves, without being afraid of being assassinated by Halliburton sharpshooters.

Katrina Cartoons: The (Jackson, MS) Clarion-Ledger's editorial cartoonist, Marshall Ramsey, has some great cartoons about the aftermath of Katrina. Here are links for his cartoons on Aug 29th, Aug 30th, and Aug 31st.

Ramsey is a New Republic-y liberal, but when it counts, he's very good.

One more animal post: In response to my post from yesterday regarding helping out animal victims of Katrina, Amanda pointed out that the ASPCA is also accepting donations. Here's the link.

I'm confused about something. During the Tsunami tragedy people all over the world were screaming that America simply wasn't doing enough to help the victims; not enough money, not enough man-power, not enough ships, not enough...everything. Where now, exactly, are all those countries and their aid in our time of need? Where are their troops? Where are their millions of dollars?

Granted, I haven't scoured the news this morning in search of such things - so I could be terribly wrong. But, it seems to me that those countries (France, Germany, Spain, etc.) are largely silent at this time. I find that a bit hypocritical.

Update: Let me make something clear: we don't need anyone's help from around the world. We're Americans. That means we save the day....everyday. What makes us the greatest nation on earth is that we'll take care of business at home and still find time to bail out the world whenever it has a problem. I just find it strange that when tragedy strikes around the globe, all eyes are on us trying to figure out what move we are going to make. And, when we do actually help, it's never even close to being enough. But, when tragedy strikes here? Where's the international outpouring of support?

Frankly, I simply don't believe that the majority of the international community cares that much.

James, you ignorant slut, Part II: Following up on Hunter's post about RFK Jr.'s idiocy, I'm going to once again point out James Wolcott's statement about rooting for hurricanes, mainly because he not only made the reprehensible statement, but also that he's lying about having removed it. In case you've forgotten about it, here's what the twee little twit had to say a few months ago:

I root for hurricanes. When, courtesy of the Weather Channel, I see one forming in the ocean off the coast of Africa, I find myself longing for it to become big and strong--Mother Nature's fist of fury, Gaia's stern rebuke. Considering the havoc mankind has wreaked upon nature with deforesting, stripmining, and the destruction of animal habitat, it only seems fair that nature get some of its own back and teach us that there are forces greater than our own. Sure, a hearty volcano can be enjoyable. Burning rivers of lava: so picturesque. But a volcano is stationary, like Dennis Hastert after a big lunch. It doesn't offer the same dramatic suspense. Hurricanes are in unpredictable flux. They move, change direction, strengthen, weaken, lose an eyewall, repair an eyewall; they seem to have volition and opera-diva personalities.

So there's something disappointing when a hurricane doesn't make landfall, or peters out into a puny Category One.
As I noted a few days ago, after that post generated controversy, he made this ALL-CAP ADDITION:

(THIS HAS PROVEN TO BE MY MOST POPULAR POST AMONG RIGHTWING BLOGGERS. I HAVE COME TO CONSIDER IT MY GIFT TO THEM--OR YOU, IF YOU HAPPEN TO BE ONE OF 'THEM.' WHENEVER A NEW STORM BREWS, I FEEL CONFIDENT YOU WILL RETURN HERE TO QUOTE IT YET AGAIN.

AND FOR THOSE OF YOU DISCOVERING IT FOR THE FIRST TIME, HOLD ON TO YOUR PHONY INDIGNATION AND LET IT WARM YOU THROUGH THE DARK DAYS AHEAD.

KISSES AND TWINKLING THOUGHTS FROM ME,
JW)

Now, on his main page, he makes this claim. And by "claim," I mean "lie."

I've removed my earlier post about hurricanes ("An Ignoble Confession"); it was written in a frivolous vacation mood, and this is not the time for frivolity.

As you can tell by clicking on the link, the post hasn't been removed at all. And note that even in his lie, he doesn't retract his sentiment; he only says that it was written in a "frivolous vacation mood," as if that excuses his reprehensible position.

So he's not only an unrepentant, insensitive idiot, he's also a liar.

Best photo essay I've seen yet on the effects of the storm on New Orleans. Click here.

Faith-based bleg: Does anyone know of a good white paper discussing the constitutionality of government funding faith-based initiatives/charities? A friend of mine will be debating the issue in the near future, and I'd like to help him out. I did some initial research via Google, but I didn't find anything all that impressive. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

According to RFK, Jr.: God Hates Haley Barbour

You see, because Haley was insufficiently invested in environmental regulation, the Lord redirected Katrina from New Orleans and decided to slam Mississippi.

Look out, Haley. Greenpeace has a direct line to heaven.

Because the politician in question's last name is Kennedy (and you know that's not as in D. James Kennedy), he will receive somewhat different treatment for this pithy statement than he would have if he were surnamed Falwell or Robertson.

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

The Reach of Katrina: According to my mama, there are a whole lot of broken tree branches, no ATM service, and runs on gas stations around Greenville and Leland, MS where she, my dad, and dad's folks live (and I do, too, though I'm up at my parents' house in Clarksville, TN, 40 miles NW from Nashville, for job hunting purposes for the last month and my dad and Annie (our dog) have been up here since Sun.) Keep in mind, that Greenville (pop. 41,000) and Leland (pop. 5,500) are close to the intersection where the borders of AR, LA, and MS met. Mama can't get a hold of my aunt (her sister) and her mama (my grandmother) in Philadelphia, MS, (east central MS, near AL) over the phone since apparently the lines are down in that area, though I'm sure they're safe

Up here in Clarksville, the remnants of Katrina came here last night and day. It rained a good deal during the night with it drizzling during the day, not unlike a regular ol' storm.

I've been watching Fox News show pictures of the devastation of Biloxi. There's a pile of tractor-trailers that look like they're been tossed around and left there by some huge rambunctious five-year-old. Plus, a big piece of a water-front casino is now conveniently located on the nearby four-lane road.

Like Biloxi and nearby Gulfport, New Orleans is now, well, an unintentional Venice.

Just keep everybody affected by the Killer Katrina in your prayers along with the brave rescuers trying to save everybody they can.

ID vs. Darwinism: Dr. Jonathan Witt has a short, but sweet response to a point made in John Derbyshire's harangue against teaching intelligent design.

UPDATE: Mr. Heddle has a snazy response to Derbyshire, too, and Dr. Witt has further comments at his own blog where he quotes a certain blogger.

UPDATE II: Bart Harmon e-mailed to point out some more ID/Evolution discussion going on here, here, and here.

Animals need rescuing, too: In the grand scheme of things, of course, the plight of animals ranks far below the plight of human beings. However, there's nothing wrong with helping out animals while we help out the human victims of Hurricane Katrina. I can't imagine how many pets have been abandoned by families fleeing Katrina, and the Humane Society of the United States is asking for donations to help them deal with Katrina's aftermath. Just thinking about Peabody the Wonderdog and Penelope the Supercute Puppy being left to fend for themselves like so many pets in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama breaks my heart. If you're of the same mind, click here to make a donation via a secure site. Every little bit helps.

Update: Some of you are probably like me and love animals, but don't always agree with everything the HSUS does. But let's put the contentiousness behind us right now and just help the critters.

Someone is putting together a Katrina Help Wiki, here, "modeled on the excellent tsunami wiki site" from 2004. They're seeking volunteers "to take blog postings and classify them properly" for the site. If you're interested, you can contact them at katrinahelp.info@gmail.com (Hat tip to Josh Britton.)

Katrina's damage defies description: For info on New Orleans, which is now dealing with a levee breach on its lake side, see Brendan Loy. For the story on the Mississippi Coast, the Sun-Herald newspaper has a blog and many photos up. The Mobile Register is the place to go for info from further east, including this blog.

An oil rig slammed into the Cochrane Bridge (US 90) over Mobile Bay. Photo here.

Other area newspapers' editions today (several are internet only):

New Orleans Times-Picayune

Pascagoula The Mississippi Press

Hattiesburg American

Jackson Clarion-Ledger

Baton Rouge The Advocate

Pensacola News-Journal

Faith and the Academic Job Search: Here's an interesting essay in Chronicle by a Christian facing many of the same issues I am - how to present myself when applying to jobs when being known as a Christian could be a problem.

Is Dubya finally getting realistic about Iraq?

Robert Higgs from the Independent Institute offers his thoughts on the recent Washington Post article entitled "U.S. Lowers Sights On What Can Be Achieved in Iraq: Administration Is Shedding 'Unreality. '" According to Higgs:


The Bush administration, the article explains, no longer expects to produce a model democracy, a well-functioning oil industry, or "a society in which the majority of people are free from serious security or economic challenges" in Iraq. In short, the country is in terrible shape, and the U.S. government cannot solve the Iraqis’ most pressing problems. According to a senior U.S. official, "what we expected to achieve was never realistic given the timetable or what unfolded on the ground. We are in a process of absorbing the factors of the situation we’re in and shedding the unreality that dominated at the beginning."

And a good dose of reality is needed for those who still believe that America's duty is to establish democracy by force in lands with little or no democratic history.

Thanks to all of y'all for your prayers: We signed an agreement to sell our current home yesterday. One it has passed inspection (which it easily will), the agreement will be a done deal, and the Dillard family will move into our new home on October 1st. Hooray! :)

Stare decisis is fo' suckas redux, courtesy of my man Publius:

Justice Thomas is openly hostile to precedent that is inconsistent with the original understanding of the Constitution. Presumably, he would disregard it all if he could gain a majority for his views. Thomas’s jurisprudence may be worthy of debate, but what is not debatable is that Thomas would be uncontrolled by past decisions – and thus by the collective wisdom of the judiciary and its experiences over generations. He would be a bull in the china shop of precedent, breaking anything that got in the way.


Exactly. And that's why Thomas is the man.

Admin. note: Yes, I realize that I have not followed through on my promises with regard to the SDIFS! t-shirts. I will try to remedy that major breach in blogging protocol sometime in the near future.

Monday, August 29, 2005

Random Thoughts for Today:

I watched Fox News this morning and there was the required "reporter in windbreaker being drenched by rain and almost being blown away by the 70 mph wind while an anchor sitting comfortably in the home studio in his expensive suit casually asks him questions" segment. I kept shouting to the rain-and-wind-battered reporter on TV, "Get you and your crew inside, before you get killed!" (Sigh), they never listen.

Attention national news reporters, Biloxi is pronounced "buh-LUX-ee", not "bah-LOX-ee".

On behalf of us low-level members of the VRWC, I would like to thank Karl Rove for causing Hurricane Katrina in order to divert attention away from Cindy Sheehan.

"Sunday Bloody Sunday" by U2 is one of the coolest songs of all time.

Being 24 feels a lot like 23.

Job Announcements: From the latest batch of job announcements:

Chairperson. Rank of Associate or Professor. Tenure track. Ph.D. is required and two years of administrative experience are preferred. Fields of study: Asian Politics preferred, but all fields will be considered excluding American Politics. Teach 3/3 and supervise department of seven offering both the B.A. and M.A. MSU is a public regional university in a city of 104,000, two hours northwest of Dallas/Fort Worth (www.mwsu.edu). Members of protected groups are particularly encouraged to apply. Start date is Fall, 2006. Applications received by December 15 will be given full consideration. Send letter, CV, and names of three references to Dr. Samuel Watson, Dean, College of Liberal Arts, Midwestern State University, 3410 Taft Blvd., Wichita Falls, TX 76308. ADA/EOE.


Italics are mine. That's the first time I've seen that phraseology used. Usually, it's, "women and minorities" or "members of historically underrepresented groups." Interesting little phrase, don't ya' think?

Here's a long list of Hurricane Katrina blogs, courtesy of Terry Teachout (with a hat tip to K-Lo on The Corner).

Much more from PunditGuy.

There's an amazing photo of the damage to the roof of the Superdome, on the NOLA hurricane blog.

Now listen up. This here is some major league B.S. censorship nanny-state crapola.

The University of California system is refusing to take students from a Christian high school that teaches unorthodox views of biology and history. They say the students will be "unprepared."

I'm not sure when I've heard anything quite so insincere.

It doesn't matter whether you slept through biology in high school, you will be aware of Darwin. In fact, these Christian students will have heard of Darwin and his theory, if only in the manner of refutation. Having been taught the "correct" version of the theory of origins has zero to do with one's eventual performance at the university.

Imagine this scenario: Benighted, fundamentalist Christian student goes to a school teaching a highly Christocentric version of history, science, etc. He also happens to be quite intelligent and trots out an SAT score around 1450. Question: Will this young man have any trouble putting up A's in the University of Californa institutions? Noooooooooooooooooooooo.

Given that is the case, there can be only one reason for the policy recently announced. Intimidation. Welcome to secular totalitarianism lite. (HT: Ted Olsen at Christianity Today on the web)

Update: We could end up with some interesting first amendment questions here. We seem to be tapping into the nexus of speech, free exercise, and establishment. I predict the UC system will back down.

Happy Birthday to me, happy birthday to me... yep, yours truly hits the big 2-4 today. Of course, that's bigger news than some big storm about to hit New Orleans. Seriously though, I do hope everybody down there makes it through okay.

Also, I want to get angry at James Wolcott for this post, but to be honestly, I feel nothing but pity that he's so shallow.

"Witnessing Genocide In Sudan": For those of you who missed the 60 Minutes report on Darfur last night, you can read the transcript from the program here.

And this image still haunts me:

Sunday, August 28, 2005

The following is a post from Jim Dunn, who's getting rejected by Blogger this evening:

I’m a former resident of New Orleans, and it’s not an exaggeration to say that I was miserable the entire year I lived there. NOLA is the epitome of the city that’s a great place to visit, but not to put down roots. So it’s not on my list of favorite places. But I am seriously worried about Hurricane Katrina smacking the city.

The city that sits in a big bowl surrounded by levees (although the CNN report below refers to them as “levys”) can be laid pretty low by a big rainstorm. Flooding is a very common occurrence from showers that would cause slight problems in most areas. Since it does sit in a bowl, all the water has to be pumped out by massive pumping stations before everything gets back to normal.

But that’s from a rainstorm. A direct hit from a hurricane is as different from a rainstorm as NO is from Salt Lake City. And there’s a possibility that exact thing could happen. Here’s a little of what CNN.com has to say about that.

Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco said that President Bush had called and urged the state to order the evacuation.

About 485,000 people live in the city, and many began evacuating before sunrise.

Blanco said that westbound traffic was heavy and that the state police was urging people to travel to the north or east.

Shelters have been set up at 10 sites, including the Superdome, for people who cannot leave the city for medical or other reasons, but Nagin said they should be used only as a "last resort." (See video from New Orleans, where not all are ready to leave)

He said people who must stay in the shelter should bring enough food, water and supplies to last several days.

The National Hurricane Center in Miami said low-lying areas along the Gulf Coast could expect storm surges of up to 25 feet as the Category 5 storm makes landfall early Monday.

Officials fear New Orleans is vulnerable because it sits an average of 6 feet below sea level. (Watch video of how New Orleans reacted to warning) (Sorry, Jim, but I can't find this link. -- Mike)

Nagin said the storm surge would likely topple the levy [sic] system that protects the city.

"It has the potential for a large loss of life," said Max Mayfield, director of the NHC.

Here’s more from Breitbart.com, courtesy of Drudge.

The hurricane's landfall could still come in Mississippi and affect Alabama and Florida, but it looked likely to come ashore Monday morning on the southeastern Louisiana coast, said Ed Rappaport, deputy director of the National Hurricane Center in Miami. That put New Orleans squarely in the crosshairs.

"If it came ashore with the intensity it has now and went to the New Orleans area, it would be the strongest we've had in recorded history there," Rappaport said in a telephone interview Sunday morning. "We're hoping of course there'll be a slight tapering off at least of the winds, but we can't plan on that. So whichever area gets hit, this is going to be a once in a lifetime event for them."

He said loss of life was "what inevitably occurs" with a storm this strong.

"We're in for some trouble here no matter what," he said.

Here's where it starts getting really scary.

On a recent evening, a scientist pulls up in the French Quarter. Joe Suhayda takes a plastic rod out of his trunk and he proceeds to show us what could happen the next time a hurricane hits New Orleans.

"OK, this is tool that I have a range rod," explains Suyhayda. "It will show us how high the water would be if we were hit with a Category Five Hurricane."

Which would mean what?

"Twenty feet of water above where we are standing now," says Suyhayda.

Twenty?

A Category Five Hurricane is the most powerful storm on a scientific scale. Suhayda plants the rod on the sidewalk next to a 200-year-old building that's all wrought iron balconies and faded brick and wooden shutters. Every click marks another foot that the flood would rise up this building.

I can't believe you're still going.

"Yeah, still going," says Suyhayda.

Until a couple months ago, Suhayda ran a prominent research center at Louisiana State University. They've developed the most detailed computer models that anybody's ever used to predict how hurricanes could affect this region. Studies suggest that there's roughly a one in six chance that a killer hurricane will strike New Orleans over the next 50 years.

Suhayda is still extending his stick as he describes what he is doing, "It's well above the second floor, just about to the rooftop."

It's hard to comprehend.

"Yes," agrees Suyahada, "it is really, to think that that much water would occur in this city during a catastrophic storm."

Do you expect this kind of hurricane—this kind of flooding—will hit New Orleans in our lifetime?

"Well I would say the probability is yes," says Suyahada. "In terms of past experience, we've had three storms that were near misses—that could have done at least something close to this."

Basically, the part of New Orleans that most Americans—most people around the world—think is New Orleans, would disappear.

The loss of life and livelihood of NO residents would of course be the greatest tragedy. But the effects of a direct hit would reach far beyond Louisiana. NO lies in the heart of America’s oil refining and importing industriae. Here’s a view of the economic impact a direct impact on those facilities would have.

The equipment located in the storm's likely path includes the bulk of the nation's oil and gas production platforms, thousands of miles of pipelines and -- perhaps most importantly for national gasoline prices -- much of the country's refinery capacity. In addition, the south Louisiana coastline serves as the entry point for around a third of the nation's imported oil.

Last year's Hurricane Ivan, which came ashore along the Alabama-Florida line moving through an area mostly devoid of rigs, caused widespread destruction both above and below water in the fields off Alabama and eastern Louisiana. Floating rigs were found drifting hundreds of miles from the wells they had been plumbing, while some rigs with legs fixed to the bottom toppled into the sea. Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of pipelines were tangled and torn to pieces by sea currents and massive underwater mudslides.

The full extent of the damage wasn't known for days and the Gulf lost nearly 30 percent of production capacity for well over a month, which drove prices for oil up $12 a barrel within a few weeks. Prices for both oil and natural gas surged upward and stayed high for months.

Major threat

But that storm was just a baby tap on the Gulf's infrastructure compared with the blow some in the oil industry are predicting from Katrina.


Like I said, I’m seriously concerned about this hurricane. Of course, some people root for them. Note that the esteemed Mr. Wolcott has added this ALL-CAP REJOINDER:

(THIS HAS PROVEN TO BE MY MOST POPULAR POST AMONG RIGHTWING BLOGGERS. I HAVE COME TO CONSIDER IT MY GIFT TO THEM--OR YOU, IF YOU HAPPEN TO BE ONE OF 'THEM.' WHENEVER A NEW STORM BREWS, I FEEL CONFIDENT YOU WILL RETURN HERE TO QUOTE IT YET AGAIN.

AND FOR THOSE OF YOU DISCOVERING IT FOR THE FIRST TIME, HOLD ON TO YOUR PHONY INDIGNATION AND LET IT WARM YOU THROUGH THE DARK DAYS AHEAD.

KISSES AND TWINKLING THOUGHTS FROM ME,
JW)

Evidently, Mr. Wolcott believes being concerned about the lives of thousands, and quite possibly the quality of life of tens of millions, is “PHONY INDIGNATION.”

Given the Hurricane situation, it may be a very simple matter of media analysis to suggest that the Cindy Sheehan story reached its official terminus a few hours ago.

Katrina on the way: I've just gotten home from a visit to Mississippi over the weekend. Somehow I remained oblivious to just how big a storm Katrina is, until I got to my parents' house -- where they set me straight. The Times-Picayune website has a ton of info, including this really sobering map of what might happen to the Big Easy (from Saturday, so maybe now not so current?). Prayers and best wishes to all along the Gulf Coast, and those of you inland too close for comfort.

A Moment of Personal Privilege: I'd be remiss not to offer warm congratulations to loyal SA readers (and my friends) Nels Peterson and Jennifer Carter on the occassion of their engagement. (Nels is finishing up his clerkship for -- who else? -- the Honorable Judge Pryor; Jenn is beginning her term as Editor-in-Chief of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.) Two young lovebirds were never better matched.

Saturday, August 27, 2005

Speaking of things going on in B'ham this weekend, I'm sitting here watching Hoover and Nease play on ESPN. Hoover is the 4th ranked team in the country and they are absolutely amazing.
Also, MTV is following the team for the whole season and doing a documentary on them. I think they've won 3 out of the last 4 championships, etc.
In any case, could any of you have ever thought it possible to be playing on ESPN while you were in HS? Or, have MTV following you around showing the world your life...when you're 16? I'm amazed at the attention these kids are getting at such a young age. I think it's an awesome opportunity for them, but I also can't shake the feeling that it's a little much for a teenager. Hmm, maybe I'm just jealous? :)

Oh, and speaking of high schoolers on TV - is anyone else addicted to Laguna Beach, or is it just extremely sad that watching dramatic 17 and 18 yr. olds talk about the prom is the highlight of my Monday nights? This week Jason is going to break Jessica's heart...I just know it. And for what I ask? Second-rate Alex H.? As if!
Oh, and LC's hotter than Kristin. On this there can be no debate.

There's a big BBQ festival/competition underway in Birmingham this weekend. Just thought some of you out there might be interested and in the vicinity.
"It's a very intense time on Saturday morning," said Black, a state champion cooker in Alabama and North Carolina. "They'll be down with tweezers to remove flecks of pepper just to win appearance points.

Anglophile corner: The Telegraph's Charles Moore has some thoughts on the idea of Britain, in his column today.

Just one week until the Weis era begins at ND: Go Irish!

Beat Pittsburgh!

"Gimme That Ol' Time Separation." That is the title of an article of mine that was just published in the Chapman Law Review 8.1 (Spring 2005): 309-327. You can download an adobe file of it by clicking here. It is a review essay Philip Hamburger's book, Separation of Church and State (Harvard University Press, 2002).

Friday, August 26, 2005

"DEFINING CONSERVATISM DOWN": A couple of weeks ago, I noted with enthusiasm my friend Austin Bramwell's article in The American Conservative. The article is now available online, and I encourage all to read it straight away.

I must note that I type this from my folks' study in Bettendorf, Iowa. My wife, daughter and I are now in Week Three of our four-week vacation (between the Bar Exam and the beginning of my new job). Sandwiched between two weddings, we spent the first half of the break with her family at their cabin on a lake in Upper Michigan, and now we're with my folks. At the cabin a 28.8K dial-up connection made Internet use impractical, and I must say that the break has been a true relief. The fever swamps of Washington barely make a blip in the local news ... a far cry from the constant Hillwatch in the pages of Washington's pages. Everyone should take such a break, especially bloggers!

On that note, I think I'll sit on the patio with a beer and further ignore Washington, Crawford, and all points in between. Cheers!

Humans are "Just Another Primate"

A recent scan of Drudge lead me to this AP article about a "Human Exhibit" at the London Zoo. It seems that the purpose of the exhibit is to emphasize the point that humans are just one more animal among many on the planet, and have no special status:

"Warning: Humans in their Natural Environment" read the sign at the entrance to the exhibit, where the captives could be seen on a rock ledge in a bear enclosure, clad in bathing suits and pinned-on fig leaves. Some played with hula hoops, some waved.

Visitors stopped to point and laugh, and several children could be heard asking, "Why are there people in there?"

London Zoo spokeswoman Polly Wills says that's exactly the question the zoo wants to answer.

"Seeing people in a different environment, among other animals ... teaches members of the public that the human is just another primate," Wills said.

. . . .

Tom Mahoney, 26, decided to participate after his friend sent him an e-mail about the contest as a joke. Anything that draws attention to apes, he said, has his support.

"A lot of people think humans are above other animals," he told The Associated Press. "When they see humans as animals, here, it kind of reminds us that we're not that special."

Whether intended to or not, this type of thinking suffers from all of the obvious problems with the evolutionary materialistic view of the world. The freshman's reductio comes without difficulty: if "the human is just another primate," then why is it wrong for one human to kill, rape or torture another human? These acts may be painful, but they cannot be "wrong" or "evil." If we are nothing but bags of chemicals, then one bag of chemicals putting a knife (also a collection of chemicals) into another bag of chemicals can have no "moral" implications whatsoever. (In fact, there can also be no true freedom -- I do what I do not because I am a living soul with free choice, but because it is inevitably what I must do because my acts are nothing more than the end result of electrochemical processes.) Morality simply cannot be justified under the evolutionary materialistic worldview -- and many have followed that line of thinking with disastrous consequences.

It is only from a theistic worldview (I would argue for the Christian worldview in particular) that rules of morality can be justified. Particular acts are evil as a matter of revelatory truth, and we know these things implicitly because we are created in God's image and have His laws written on our hearts. Because of this, humans are "special."

Error Messages:



Juan Cole probably wonders why he keeps getting the above error message.

Also, for some weird reason, I keep getting this one:


(I created these image with this page.)

What the snot are we complaining about? Gas prices too high? Try Europe.
When Guy Colombier pulls his economy car up to a Paris pump, he allows himself just 15 Euros ($18) worth of gas - barely enough for three gallons. Since prices started rising rapidly earlier this year, says Mr. Colombier, a printing press worker, "I drive a lot more slowly ... and I'm looking for a place to live closer to where I work."

Colombier's pain is shared by drivers all over Europe, where fuel prices are the highest in the world: a gallon of gas in Amsterdam now costs $7.13, compared with just $2.61 in America. The contrast in prices and environmental policies - and the dramatically different behaviors they inspire - signals a widening transatlantic energy gap. And it raises the question: Does Europe offer America a glimpse of its future?

Me: That's a good question. I have to wonder: are we headed for European gas prices? Probably...if Democrats (AKA, Europe-lovers) have anything to do with it. They want everything else to be just like France...

That's a joke. (No it's not.) Ok, yes it is.

John Roberts, Neo-Confederate?: This Washington Post article is perhaps the most hilarious thing that I've read in a while. The problem is that the writer, Jo Becker, probably didn't intend it to be so. Here's the first paragraphs:

When John G. Roberts Jr. prepared to ghostwrite an article for President Ronald Reagan a little over two decades ago, his pen took a Civil War reenactment detour.

The article, which was to appear in the scholarly National Forum journal, was called "The Presidency: Roles and Responsibilities." Roberts was writing by hand a section on how the congressional appropriations process had evolved.

A fastidious editor of other people's copy as well as his own, Roberts began with the words "Until about the time of the Civil War." Then, the Indiana native scratched out the words "Civil War" and replaced them with "War Between the States."

The handwritten document is one of tens of thousands of pages of Roberts files released over the past several weeks from his 1982-1986 tenure as an associate counsel to the president.

Gasp! He used "War Between the States" instead of "Civil War"! Next, Becker, asks some history professors about this and hilarity ensues:

While it is true that the Civil War is also known as the War Between the States, the Encyclopedia Americana notes that the term is used mainly by southerners. Sam McSeveney, a history professor emeritus at Vanderbilt University who specialized in the Civil War, said that Roberts's choice of words was significant.

"Many people who are sympathetic to the Confederate position are more comfortable with the idea of a 'War Between the States,' " McSeveney explained. "People opposed to the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s would undoubtedly be more comfortable with the words he chose."

John M. Coski, the historian and library director of the Museum of the Confederacy in Richmond, said the term was commonplace in the South until the 1960s or early 1970s. He said some people use "War Between the States" out of habit, others think it quaint or iconoclastic, and still others use it because they believe the Confederacy was right to secede.

"You can't always draw the inference that someone who uses the term does so with an ideological intent, but at the same time you can't be blind to the fact that some people do," Coski said.

Reagan used the phrase "War Between the States" in at least a few speeches he gave in the South. But in the end, someone must have had second thoughts about using it with this more national audience. When the article was published in August 1984 under Reagan's name, it employed the more generally accepted "Civil War" terminology.

I'm sure that Ol' Massa Roberts pines for the days of the Confederacy where slavery thrived while he wears a seersucker suit and sips on mint-julips. I bet he's probably still not over the fact that black can vote.

Talk about much ado about nothing. So apparently because Roberts used "War Between the States" ("WBTS" as we cool people call it) instead of "Civil War" that's cause to write an article on it and ask "experts" who suggest that Robert's may be sympathetic with the CSA with the implication that Robert's might not care for civil rights of blacks. Oh, please.

And if you stop to think about it, "War Between the States" is a more accurate name than "Civil War" for the 1861-1865 "disagreement". A civil war is between two or more groups trying to gain complete control of a country. Since the war had one side that was trying to form its own country and another that was seeking to prevent that from happening, it wasn't a "civil war"

Now, personally, I prefer "War Against Northern Aggression"...

The Yale Federalist Society now has a blog.

What would PETA say?
Wonder if any animal-rights wackos would fight for the rights of the smoking Chinese chimp?

The handlers of a smoking chimpanzee in a zoo in northwest China are trying to get her to kick the habit.

The 26-year-old female chimpanzee has been smoking for 15 years. Her mate died recently, which caused her to smoke even more.

Now, the chimp's keepers are worried about her health as a result of her intense smoking. So, they're trying to give her milk instead of cigarettes.

She started smoking years ago by picking up butts from tourists.


And were all the butts really from "tourists"? Surely, there are at least a few native Chinese butts thrown in? And who lit the butts for the chimp? And if she started smoking by picking up butts, has she since graduated to full packs of cigarettes? The story implies that she has, because her smoking is "intense." If so, where does she get them? The story implies that she has been getting them from her handlers -- the same handlers who are now "trying to give her milk instead of cigarettes."

Well, boys, there's your solution -- if you don't want the chimp to smoke, don't give her any cigarettes. Sounds easy enough. What's she going to do, drive her car down to the corner grocery and get them herself? Geez....

Have fun in the comments, this looks like a gold mine....

This is HUGE for Thune: Commission Votes to Save Ellsworth Base
The surprise decision was a setback for Pentagon leaders, a blessing for South Dakotans who feared losing about 4,000 jobs, and a victory for Sen. John Thune and the state's other politicians who lobbied vigorously to save the base. Thune, a freshman Republican, unseated then-Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle partly on the strength of his claim he could help save the base.

Fourth Circuit reverses grant of summary judgment for Jerry Falwell

In Lamparello v. Falwell, the Fourth Circuit reversed a district court order enjoining Lamparello from maintaining a website critical of Reverend Jerry Falwell. Falwell's claims were for trademark infringement and cybersquatting of the website www.fallwell.com. The Fourth Circuit reversed summary judgment for Falwell and entered summary judgment for Lamparello. A summary of the court's opinion can be found here.

Thursday, August 25, 2005

Make that "And" rather than "But": Now he tells me:

The Internet is riddled with false quotes attributed to More, or quotes from A Man for All Seasons claiming to be the real More's words. Even More's carefully chosen dying words are often misquoted by his advocates, the Honorable Robert Bork for instance. Judge Bork, with the great majority of educated mankind, misquoted Thomas More as having said at the scaffold, "I die the King's good servant but God's first." What he actually said is "I die the King's good servant and God's first." More's final words were ones not of conflict or tragedy, but of hopefulness and harmony between God and man, church and state, the individual and the collective.


While I do take some comfort in Judge Bork having made the same mistake, I simply cannot have a blog title based on a misquote. As such, BGF will now be known as AGF.

Genocide and Statistics: Here's the latest from the CFD:

Last week, International Studies Quarterly published a study by Matthew Krain, an Associate Professor of Political Science at the College of Wooster, examining "the effectiveness of military action on the severity of ongoing instances of genocide and polititcide."

According to the press release
The study reveals that only overt military interventions that explicitly challenge the perpetrator appear to be effective in reducing the severity of the brutal policies. Military support for targets, or in opposition to the perpetrators, alters the almost complete vulnerability of unarmed civilian targets. And these interventions that directly target the perpetrators were not, on the whole, found to make matters worse for those being attacked ... He finds that even military intervention against the perpetrator by a single country or international organization has a measurable effect in the "typical" case.

When a single international actor challenges the aggressor, the probability that the killings will escalate drops while the probability that the killings will decrease jumps. Each additional intervention by another international actor raises the chance of saving lives.
In the introduction to the study, Krain notes
Policy makers faced with situations like those in Rwanda or Bosnia, Kosovo or Darfur, are forced to rely on past experience with interventions in other types of internal conflicts, often with disastrous results. This study is a step toward a better understanding of the effectiveness of potential responses by the international community to genocides and politicides.
Krain goes on to examine various intervention meth